Consumer experience portrayal effectiveness assessment system

ABSTRACT

A system assesses consumer experience portrayal effectiveness by evaluating neuro-response measurements for a consumer directly experiencing stimulus and/or indirectly experiencing stimulus through observation of another. Neuro-response measurements are collected using multiple modalities to evaluate personal and observed experiences of products, services, offerings, and stimulus. Examples of neuro-response measurements include Electroencephalography (EEG), Galvanic Skin Response (GSR), Electrocardiograms (EKG), Electrooculography (EOG), eye tracking, and facial emotion encoding measurements. In many instances, neuro-response data is combined with other data and analyzed to assess total consumer experience portrayal effectiveness.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This patent claims priority to Provisional Patent Application 60/968,563 titled Total Consumer Experience Portrayal Effectiveness Assessment System, by Anantha Pradeep, Robert T. Knight, and Ramachandran Gurumoorthy, and filed on Aug. 28, 2007, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by this reference. This patent is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/056,190; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/056,211; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/056,221; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/056,225; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/113,863; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/113,870; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/122,240; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/122,253; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/122,262; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/135,066; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/135,074; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/182,851; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/182,874; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/199,557; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/199,583; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/200,813; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/234,372; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/135,069; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/234,388; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/544,921; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/544,934; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/546,586; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/544,958; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/846,242; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/410,380; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/410,372; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/413,297; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/545,455; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/608,660; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/608,685; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/444,149; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/608,696; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/731,868; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/045,457; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/778,810; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/778,828; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/104,821; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/104,840; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/853,197; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/884,034; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/868,531; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/913,102; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/853,213; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/105,774.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure relates to a consumer experience portrayal effectiveness assessment system.

DESCRIPTION OF RELATED ART

Conventional systems for assessing consumer experience portrayal effectiveness are limited. Some consumer experience portrayal effectiveness assessment systems are based on demographic information, statistical data, and survey based response collection. However, conventional systems are subject to semantic, syntactic, metaphorical, cultural, and interpretive errors.

Consequently, it is desirable to provide improved methods and apparatus for estimating and assessing consumer experience portrayal effectiveness.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The disclosure may best be understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, which illustrate particular example embodiments.

FIG. 1 illustrates one example of a system for assessing consumer experience portrayal effectiveness.

FIG. 2 illustrates examples of stimulus attributes that can be included in a stimulus attributes repository.

FIG. 3 illustrates examples of data models that can be used with a stimulus and response repository.

FIG. 4 illustrates one example of a query that can be used with the consumer experience portrayal effectiveness assessment system.

FIG. 5 illustrates one example of a report generated using the consumer experience portrayal effectiveness assessment system.

FIG. 6 illustrates one example of a technique for performing consumer experience portrayal effectiveness assessment.

FIG. 7 illustrates one example of technique for analyzing consumer experience portrayal effectiveness assessment data.

FIG. 8 provides one example of a system that can be used to implement one or more mechanisms.

DESCRIPTION OF PARTICULAR EMBODIMENTS

Reference will now be made in detail to some specific examples of the invention including the best modes contemplated by the inventors for carrying out the invention. Examples of these specific embodiments are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. While the invention is described in conjunction with these specific embodiments, it will be understood that it is not intended to limit the invention to the described embodiments. On the contrary, it is intended to cover alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.

For example, the techniques and mechanisms of the present invention will be described in the context of particular types of data such as central nervous system, autonomic nervous system, and effector data. However, it should be noted that the techniques and mechanisms of the present invention apply to a variety of different types of data. It should be noted that various mechanisms and techniques can be applied to any type of stimuli. In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. Particular example embodiments of the present invention may be implemented without some or all of these specific details. In other instances, well known process operations have not been described in detail in order not to unnecessarily obscure the present invention.

Various techniques and mechanisms of the present invention will sometimes be described in singular form for clarity. However, it should be noted that some embodiments include multiple iterations of a technique or multiple instantiations of a mechanism unless noted otherwise. For example, a system uses a processor in a variety of contexts. However, it will be appreciated that a system can use multiple processors while remaining within the scope of the present invention unless otherwise noted. Furthermore, the techniques and mechanisms of the present invention will sometimes describe a connection between two entities. It should be noted that a connection between two entities does not necessarily mean a direct, unimpeded connection, as a variety of other entities may reside between the two entities. For example, a processor may be connected to memory, but it will be appreciated that a variety of bridges and controllers may reside between the processor and memory. Consequently, a connection does not necessarily mean a direct, unimpeded connection unless otherwise noted.

Overview

A system assesses consumer experience portrayal effectiveness by evaluating neuro-response measurements for a consumer directly experiencing stimulus and/or indirectly experiencing stimulus through observation of another. Neuro-response measurements are collected using multiple modalities to evaluate personal and observed experiences of products, services, offerings, and stimulus. Examples of neuro-response measurements include Electroencephalography (EEG), Galvanic Skin Response (GSR), Electrocardiograms (EKG), Electrooculography (EOG), eye tracking, and facial emotion encoding measurements. In many instances, neuro-response data is combined with other data and analyzed to assess total consumer experience portrayal effectiveness.

Example Embodiments

Typically, consumer experience portrayal effectiveness assessment systems evaluate a consumer's full response to a complete experience. The experience may involve a product, service, offering, and/or stimulus. For example, one experience may involve purchasing a can of soda, holding the can of soda, hearing the sound of the can being opened, hearing the sound of the fizz, smelling the soda, feeling the temperature of the can, taking a first sip of the soda, tasting the beverage, taking subsequent sips, etc. Conventional consumer experience portrayal effectiveness assessment systems rely on demographic information, statistical information, and survey based response collection to evaluate consumer response. One problem with conventional consumer experience portrayal effectiveness assessment systems is that they do not accurately measure the responses to components of the experience. They are also prone to semantic, syntactic, metaphorical, cultural, and interpretive errors thereby preventing the accurate and repeatable portrayal effectiveness assessment of the consumer experience.

Conventional systems do not use neuro-behavioral and neuro-physiological response blended manifestations in assessing the user response and do not elicit an individual customized neuro-physiological and/or neuro-behavioral response to the stimulus. Conventional devices also fail to blend multiple datasets, and blended manifestations of multi-modal responses, across multiple datasets, individuals and modalities, to reveal and validate a consumer experience portrayal effectiveness assessment.

In these respects, the neuro-physiological and neuro-behavioral consumer experience portrayal effectiveness assessment system according to the present invention substantially departs from the conventional concepts and designs of the prior art, and in so doing provides an apparatus developed to provide neuro-physiological and neuro-behavioral response based measurement of consumer experience to various components of consumer experiences. The consumer experiences may include marketing, advertising and other audio/visual/tactile/olfactory stimulus including but not limited to communication, concept, experience, message, images, audio, pricing, and packaging.

The techniques and mechanisms of the present invention use neuro-response measurements such as central nervous system, autonomic nervous system, and effector measurements to improve consumer experience portrayal effectiveness assessment. Some examples of central nervous system measurement mechanisms include Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and Electroencephalography (EEG). fMRI measures blood oxygenation in the brain that correlates with increased neural activity. However, current implementations of fMRI have poor temporal resolution of few seconds. EEG measures electrical activity associated with post synaptic currents occurring in the milliseconds range. Subcranial EEG can measure electrical activity with the most accuracy, as the bone and dermal layers weaken transmission of a wide range of frequencies. Nonetheless, surface EEG provides a wealth of electrophysiological information if analyzed properly. Even portable EEG with dry electrodes provide a large amount of neuro-response information.

Autonomic nervous system measurement mechanisms include Galvanic Skin Response (GSR), Electrocardiograms (EKG), pupillary dilation, etc. Effector measurement mechanisms include Electrooculography (EOG), eye tracking, facial emotion encoding, reaction time etc.

According to various embodiments, the techniques and mechanisms of the present invention intelligently blend multiple modes and manifestations of precognitive neural signatures with cognitive neural signatures and post cognitive neurophysiological manifestations to more accurately perform consumer experience portrayal effectiveness assessment. In some examples, autonomic nervous system measures are themselves used to validate central nervous system measures. Effector and behavior responses are blended and combined with other measures. According to various embodiments, central nervous system, autonomic nervous system, and effector system measurements are aggregated into a measurement that allows portrayal effectiveness assessment of a total consumer experience.

In particular embodiments, subjects are exposed to stimulus material and data such as central nervous system, autonomic nervous system, and effector data is collected during exposure. According to various embodiments, data is collected in order to assess consumer experience for various components of a product, service, offering, or stimulus. For example, a consumer experience associated with eating a sandwich may involve components such as gathering the ingredients, making the sandwich, seeing and smelling the sandwich, biting into the sandwich, tasting the sandwich, etc. Other components may also be involved when a subject is viewing another eating a sandwich. For example, the consumer experience associated with viewing another may involve components such as watching the other eat the sandwich, hearing the sound of chewing, etc. The significance and saliency of neuro-responses for various components and points of view can be significantly different. According to various embodiments, a video stream displaying an experience can be annotated to include neuro-response data for various components.

In particular embodiments, specific event related potential (ERP) analyses and/or event related power spectral perturbations (ERPSPs) are evaluated for different regions of the brain both before a subject is exposed to stimulus and each time after the subject is exposed to stimulus.

Pre-stimulus and post-stimulus differential as well as target and distracter differential measurements of ERP time domain components at multiple regions of the brain are determined (DERP). Event related time-frequency analysis of the differential response to assess the attention, emotion and memory retention (DERPSPs) across multiple frequency bands including but not limited to theta, alpha, beta, gamma and high gamma is performed. In particular embodiments, single trial and/or averaged DERP and/or DERPSPs can be used to enhance the consumer experience measure

A consumer experience estimate may also incorporate relationship portrayal effectiveness assessments using brain regional coherence measures of segments of the stimuli relevant to the entity/relationship, segment effectiveness measures synthesizing the attention, emotional engagement and memory retention estimates based on the neuro-physiological measures including time-frequency analysis of EEG measurements, and differential saccade related neural signatures during segments where coupling/relationship patterns are emerging in comparison to segments with non-coupled interactions.

According to various embodiments, a consumer experience portrayal effectiveness assessment system can include automated systems with or without human intervention for the elicitation of potential object/individual groupings. For example, these could also include pattern recognition and object identification techniques. These sub-systems could include a hardware implementation and/or software implementations.

A variety of stimulus materials such as entertainment and marketing materials, media streams, billboards, print advertisements, text streams, music, performances, sensory experiences, etc., can be analyzed. According to various embodiments, enhanced neuro-response data is generated using a data analyzer that performs both intra-modality measurement enhancements and cross-modality measurement enhancements. According to various embodiments, brain activity is measured not just to determine the regions of activity, but to determine interactions and types of interactions between various regions. The techniques and mechanisms of the present invention recognize that interactions between neural regions support orchestrated and organized behavior. Attention, emotion, memory, and other abilities are not merely based on one part of the brain but instead rely on network interactions between brain regions.

The techniques and mechanisms of the present invention further recognize that different frequency bands used for multi-regional communication can be indicative of the effectiveness of stimuli. In particular embodiments, evaluations are calibrated to each subject and synchronized across subjects. In particular embodiments, templates are created for subjects to create a baseline for measuring pre and post stimulus differentials. According to various embodiments, stimulus generators are intelligent and adaptively modify specific parameters such as exposure length and duration for each subject being analyzed.

A variety of modalities can be used including EEG, GSR, EKG, pupillary dilation, EOG, eye tracking, facial emotion encoding, reaction time, etc. Individual modalities such as EEG are enhanced by intelligently recognizing neural region communication pathways. Cross modality analysis is enhanced using a synthesis and analytical blending of central nervous system, autonomic nervous system, and effector signatures. Synthesis and analysis by mechanisms such as time and phase shifting, correlating, and validating intra-modal determinations allow generation of a composite output characterizing the significance of various data responses to effectively perform consumer experience portrayal effectiveness assessment.

FIG. 1 illustrates one example of a system for performing consumer experience portrayal effectiveness assessment using central nervous system, autonomic nervous system, and/or effector measures. According to various embodiments, the consumer experience portrayal effectiveness assessment system includes a stimulus presentation device 101. In particular embodiments, the stimulus presentation device 101 is merely a display, monitor, screen, etc., that displays stimulus material to a user. The stimulus material may be a media clip, a commercial, pages of text, a brand image, a performance, a magazine advertisement, a movie, an experience, an audio presentation, and may even involve particular tastes, smells, textures and/or sounds. The stimuli can involve a variety of senses and occur with or without human supervision. Continuous and discrete modes are supported. In other examples, stimulus presentation may involve providing the user with a physical product, service, offering, or experience. According to various embodiments, the stimulus presentation device 101 also has protocol generation capability to allow intelligent customization of stimuli provided to multiple subjects in different markets.

According to various embodiments, stimulus presentation device 101 could include devices such as televisions, cable consoles, computers and monitors, projection systems, display devices, speakers, tactile surfaces, etc., for presenting the stimuli including but not limited to advertising and entertainment from different networks, local networks, cable channels, syndicated sources, websites, internet content aggregators, portals, service providers, etc.

According to various embodiments, the subjects are connected to data collection devices 105. The data collection devices 105 may include a variety of neuro-response measurement mechanisms including neurological and neurophysiological measurements systems such as EEG, EOG, GSR, EKG, pupillary dilation, eye tracking, facial emotion encoding, and reaction time devices, etc. According to various embodiments, neuro-response data includes central nervous system, autonomic nervous system, and effector data. In particular embodiments, the data collection devices 105 include EEG 111, EOG 113, and GSR 115. In some instances, only a single data collection device is used. Data collection may proceed with or without human supervision.

The data collection device 105 collects neuro-response data from multiple sources. This includes a combination of devices such as central nervous system sources (EEG), autonomic nervous system sources (GSR, EKG, pupillary dilation), and effector sources (EOG, eye tracking, facial emotion encoding, reaction time). In particular embodiments, data collected is digitally sampled and stored for later analysis. In particular embodiments, the data collected could be analyzed in real-time. According to particular embodiments, the digital sampling rates are adaptively chosen based on the neurophysiological and neurological data being measured.

In one particular embodiment, the consumer experience portrayal effectiveness assessment system includes EEG 111 measurements made using scalp level electrodes, EOG 113 measurements made using shielded electrodes to track eye data, GSR 115 measurements performed using a differential measurement system, a facial muscular measurement through shielded electrodes placed at specific locations on the face, and a facial affect graphic and video analyzer adaptively derived for each individual.

In particular embodiments, the data collection devices are clock synchronized with a stimulus presentation device 101. In particular embodiments, the data collection devices 105 also include a condition evaluation subsystem that provides auto triggers, alerts and status monitoring and visualization components that continuously monitor the status of the subject, data being collected, and the data collection instruments. The condition evaluation subsystem may also present visual alerts and automatically trigger remedial actions. According to various embodiments, the data collection devices include mechanisms for not only monitoring subject neuro-response to stimulus materials, but also include mechanisms for identifying and monitoring the stimulus materials. For example, data collection devices 105 may be synchronized with a set-top box to monitor channel changes. In other examples, data collection devices 105 may be directionally synchronized to monitor when a subject is no longer paying attention to stimulus material. In still other examples, the data collection devices 105 may receive and store stimulus material generally being viewed by the subject, whether the stimulus is a program, a commercial, printed material, an experience, or a scene outside a window. The data collected allows analysis of neuro-response information and correlation of the information to actual stimulus material and not mere subject distractions.

According to various embodiments, the consumer experience portrayal effectiveness assessment system also includes a data cleanser device 121. In particular embodiments, the data cleanser device 121 filters the collected data to remove noise, artifacts, and other irrelevant data using fixed and adaptive filtering, weighted averaging, advanced component extraction (like PCA, ICA), vector and component separation methods, etc. This device cleanses the data by removing both exogenous noise (where the source is outside the physiology of the subject, e.g. a phone ringing while a subject is viewing a video) and endogenous artifacts (where the source could be neurophysiological, e.g. muscle movements, eye blinks, etc.).

The artifact removal subsystem includes mechanisms to selectively isolate and review the response data and identify epochs with time domain and/or frequency domain attributes that correspond to artifacts such as line frequency, eye blinks, and muscle movements. The artifact removal subsystem then cleanses the artifacts by either omitting these epochs, or by replacing these epoch data with an estimate based on the other clean data (for example, an EEG nearest neighbor weighted averaging approach).

According to various embodiments, the data cleanser device 121 is implemented using hardware, firmware, and/or software. It should be noted that although a data cleanser device 121 is shown located after a data collection device 105 and before data analyzer 181, the data cleanser device 121 like other components may have a location and functionality that varies based on system implementation. For example, some systems may not use any automated data cleanser device whatsoever while in other systems, data cleanser devices may be integrated into individual data collection devices.

According to various embodiments, an optional stimulus attributes repository 131 provides information on the stimulus material being presented to the multiple subjects. According to various embodiments, stimulus attributes include properties of the stimulus materials as well as purposes, presentation attributes, report generation attributes, etc. In particular embodiments, stimulus attributes include time span, channel, rating, media, type, etc. Stimulus attributes may also include positions of entities in various frames, components, events, object relationships, locations of objects and duration of display. Purpose attributes include aspiration and objects of the stimulus including excitement, memory retention, associations, etc. Presentation attributes include audio, video, imagery, and messages needed for enhancement or avoidance. Other attributes may or may not also be included in the stimulus attributes repository or some other repository.

The data cleanser device 121 and the stimulus attributes repository 131 pass data to the data analyzer 181. The data analyzer 181 uses a variety of mechanisms to analyze underlying data in the system to determine consumer experience. According to various embodiments, the data analyzer customizes and extracts the independent neurological and neuro-physiological parameters for each individual in each modality, and blends the estimates within a modality as well as across modalities to elicit an enhanced response to the presented stimulus material. In particular embodiments, the data analyzer 181 aggregates the response measures across subjects in a dataset.

According to various embodiments, neurological and neuro-physiological signatures are measured using time domain analyses and frequency domain analyses. Such analyses use parameters that are common across individuals as well as parameters that are unique to each individual. The analyses could also include statistical parameter extraction and fuzzy logic based attribute estimation from both the time and frequency components of the synthesized response.

In some examples, statistical parameters used in a blended effectiveness estimate include evaluations of skew, peaks, first and second moments, population distribution, as well as fuzzy estimates of attention, emotional engagement and memory retention responses.

According to various embodiments, the data analyzer 181 may include an intra-modality response synthesizer and a cross-modality response synthesizer. In particular embodiments, the intra-modality response synthesizer is configured to customize and extract the independent neurological and neurophysiological parameters for each individual in each modality and blend the estimates within a modality analytically to elicit an enhanced response to the presented stimuli. In particular embodiments, the intra-modality response synthesizer also aggregates data from different subjects in a dataset.

According to various embodiments, the cross-modality response synthesizer or fusion device blends different intra-modality responses, including raw signals and signals output. The combination of signals enhances the measures of effectiveness within a modality. The cross-modality response fusion device can also aggregate data from different subjects in a dataset.

According to various embodiments, the data analyzer 181 also includes a composite enhanced effectiveness estimator (CEEE) that combines the enhanced responses and estimates from each modality to provide a blended estimate of the effectiveness. In particular embodiments, blended estimates are provided for each exposure of a subject to stimulus materials. The blended estimates are evaluated over time to assess consumer experience characteristics. According to various embodiments, numerical values are assigned to each blended estimate. The numerical values may correspond to the intensity of neuro-response measurements, the significance of peaks, the change between peaks, etc. Higher numerical values may correspond to higher significance in neuro-response intensity. Lower numerical values may correspond to lower significance or even insignificant neuro-response activity. In other examples, multiple values are assigned to each blended estimate. In still other examples, blended estimates of neuro-response significance are graphically represented to show changes after repeated exposure.

According to various embodiments, the data analyzer 181 provides analyzed and enhanced response data to a data communication device 183. It should be noted that in particular instances, a data communication device 183 is not necessary. According to various embodiments, the data communication device 183 provides raw and/or analyzed data and insights. In particular embodiments, the data communication device 183 may include mechanisms for the compression and encryption of data for secure storage and communication.

According to various embodiments, the data communication device 183 transmits data using protocols such as the File Transfer Protocol (FTP), Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) along with a variety of conventional, bus, wired network, wireless network, satellite, and proprietary communication protocols. The data transmitted can include the data in its entirety, excerpts of data, converted data, and/or elicited response measures. According to various embodiments, the data communication device is a set top box, wireless device, computer system, etc. that transmits data obtained from a data collection device to a response integration system 185. In particular embodiments, the data communication device may transmit data even before data cleansing or data analysis. In other examples, the data communication device may transmit data after data cleansing and analysis.

In particular embodiments, the data communication device 183 sends data to a response integration system 185. According to various embodiments, the response integration system 185 assesses and extracts consumer experience patterns. In particular embodiments, the response integration system 185 determines entity positions in various stimulus segments and matches position information with eye tracking paths while correlating saccades with neural portrayal effectiveness assessments of attention, memory retention, and emotional engagement. In particular embodiments, the response integration system 185 also collects and integrates user behavioral and survey responses with the analyzed response data to more effectively assess consumer experience.

A variety of data can be stored for later analysis, management, manipulation, and retrieval. In particular embodiments, the repository could be used for tracking stimulus attributes and presentation attributes, audience responses and optionally could also be used to integrate audience measurement information.

As with a variety of the components in the system, the response integration system can be co-located with the rest of the system and the user, or could be implemented in a remote location. It could also be optionally separated into an portrayal effectiveness assessment repository system that could be centralized or distributed at the provider or providers of the stimulus material. In other examples, the response integration system is housed at the facilities of a third party service provider accessible by stimulus material providers and/or users.

FIG. 2 illustrates examples of data models that may be provided with a stimulus attributes repository. According to various embodiments, a stimulus attributes data model 201 includes a channel 203, media type 205, time span 207, audience 209, and demographic information 211. A stimulus purpose data model 215 may include intents 217 and objectives 219. According to various embodiments, stimulus attributes data model 201 also includes component information 221 about various temporal, spatial, activity, and event components in an experience. For example, components may involve different scenes associated with a product experience.

According to various embodiments, another stimulus attributes data model 221 includes creation attributes 223, ownership attributes 225, broadcast attributes 227, and statistical, demographic and/or survey based identifiers for automatically integrating the neuro-physiological and neuro-behavioral response with other attributes and meta-information associated with the stimulus.

FIG. 3 illustrates examples of data models that can be used for storage of information associated with tracking and measurement of consumer experience. According to various embodiments, a dataset data model 301 includes an experiment name 303 and/or identifier, client attributes 305, a subject pool 307, logistics information 309 such as the location, date, and time of testing, and stimulus material 311 including stimulus material attributes.

In particular embodiments, a subject attribute data model 315 includes a subject name 317 and/or identifier, contact information 321, and demographic attributes 319 that may be useful for review of neurological and neuro-physiological data. Some examples of pertinent demographic attributes include marriage status, employment status, occupation, household income, household size and composition, ethnicity, geographic location, sex, race. Other fields that may be included in data model 315 include shopping preferences, entertainment preferences, and financial preferences. Shopping preferences include favorite stores, shopping frequency, categories shopped, favorite brands. Entertainment preferences include network/cable/satellite access capabilities, favorite shows, favorite genres, and favorite actors. Financial preferences include favorite insurance companies, preferred investment practices, banking preferences, and favorite online financial instruments. A variety of subject attributes may be included in a subject attributes data model 315 and data models may be preset or custom generated to suit particular purposes.

According to various embodiments, data models for neuro-feedback association 325 identify experimental protocols 327, modalities included 329 such as EEG, EOG, GSR, surveys conducted, and experiment design parameters 333 such as segments and segment attributes. Other fields may include experiment presentation scripts, segment length, segment details like stimulus material used, inter-subject variations, intra-subject variations, instructions, presentation order, survey questions used, etc. Other data models may include a data collection data model 337. According to various embodiments, the data collection data model 337 includes recording attributes 339 such as station and location identifiers, the data and time of recording, and operator details. In particular embodiments, equipment attributes 341 include an amplifier identifier and a sensor identifier.

Modalities recorded 343 may include modality specific attributes like EEG cap layout, active channels, sampling frequency, and filters used. EOG specific attributes include the number and type of sensors used, location of sensors applied, etc. Eye tracking specific attributes include the type of tracker used, data recording frequency, data being recorded, recording format, etc. According to various embodiments, data storage attributes 345 include file storage conventions (format, naming convention, dating convention), storage location, archival attributes, expiry attributes, etc.

A preset query data model 349 includes a query name 351 and/or identifier, an accessed data collection 353 such as data segments involved (models, databases/cubes, tables, etc.), access security attributes 355 included who has what type of access, and refresh attributes 357 such as the expiry of the query, refresh frequency, etc. Other fields such as push-pull preferences can also be included to identify an auto push reporting driver or a user driven report retrieval system.

FIG. 4 illustrates examples of queries that can be performed to obtain data associated with consumer experience portrayal effectiveness assessment. For example, users may query to determine what types of consumers respond most to a particular experience or component of an experience. According to various embodiments, queries are defined from general or customized scripting languages and constructs, visual mechanisms, a library of preset queries, diagnostic querying including drill-down diagnostics, and eliciting what if scenarios. According to various embodiments, subject attributes queries 415 may be configured to obtain data from a neuro-informatics repository using a location 417 or geographic information, session information 421 such as testing times and dates, and demographic attributes 419. Demographics attributes include household income, household size and status, education level, age of kids, etc.

Other queries may retrieve stimulus material based on shopping preferences of subject participants, countenance, physiological portrayal effectiveness assessment, completion status. For example, a user may query for data associated with product categories, products shopped, shops frequented, subject eye correction status, color blindness, subject state, signal strength of measured responses, alpha frequency band ringers, muscle movement portrayal effectiveness assessments, segments completed, etc. Experimental design based queries may obtain data from a neuro-informatics repository based on experiment protocols 427, product category 429, surveys included 431, and stimulus provided 433. Other fields that may used include the number of protocol repetitions used, combination of protocols used, and usage configuration of surveys.

Client and industry based queries may obtain data based on the types of industries included in testing, specific categories tested, client companies involved, and brands being tested. Response portrayal effectiveness assessment based queries 437 may include attention scores 439, emotion scores, 441, retention scores 443, and effectiveness scores 445. Such queries may obtain materials that elicited particular scores.

Response measure profile based queries may use mean measure thresholds, variance measures, number of peaks detected, etc. Group response queries may include group statistics like mean, variance, kurtosis, p-value, etc., group size, and outlier portrayal effectiveness assessment measures. Still other queries may involve testing attributes like test location, time period, test repetition count, test station, and test operator fields. A variety of types and combinations of types of queries can be used to efficiently extract data.

FIG. 5 illustrates examples of reports that can be generated. According to various embodiments, client portrayal effectiveness assessment summary reports 501 include effectiveness measures 503, component portrayal effectiveness assessment measures 505, and consumer experience measures 507. Effectiveness portrayal effectiveness assessment measures include composite portrayal effectiveness assessment measure(s), industry/category/client specific placement (percentile, ranking, etc.), actionable grouping portrayal effectiveness assessment such as removing material, modifying segments, or fine tuning specific elements, etc, and the evolution of the effectiveness profile over time. In particular embodiments, component portrayal effectiveness assessment reports include component portrayal effectiveness assessment measures like attention, emotional engagement scores, percentile placement, ranking, etc. Component profile measures include time based evolution of the component measures and profile statistical portrayal effectiveness assessments. According to various embodiments, reports include the number of times material is assessed, attributes of the multiple presentations used, evolution of the response portrayal effectiveness assessment measures over the multiple presentations, and usage recommendations.

According to various embodiments, client cumulative reports 511 include media grouped reporting 513 of all stimulus assessed, campaign grouped reporting 515 of stimulus assessed, and time/location grouped reporting 517 of stimulus assessed. According to various embodiments, industry cumulative and syndicated reports 521 include aggregate portrayal effectiveness assessment responses measures 523, top performer lists 525, bottom performer lists 527, outliers 529, and trend reporting 531. In particular embodiments, tracking and reporting includes specific products, categories, companies, brands.

FIG. 6 illustrates one example of consumer experience portrayal effectiveness assessment. At 601, stimulus material is provided to multiple subjects in the form of multiple different portrayals of a consumer experience. According to various embodiments, one portrayal may involve a subject taking peanut butter out of a refrigerator, opening the jar of peanut butter, and spreading the peanut butter on a slice of bread. Another portrayal may involve a subject spreading peanut butter on a slice of bread, spreading jelly on another slice of bread, and eating a sandwich. Each portrayal may have significantly different effectiveness ratings for different groups. At 605, another form of stimulus may be presented to the user in the form of an actual experience. For example, the subject may be handed a jar of peanut to open and smell. At 607, the subject may be presented with a video showing another person making a sandwich. The effectiveness of each experience portrayal may be assessed to determine effective components that should be emphasized or included in materials for marketing, sales, advertising, etc. In some examples, a consumer experience repository may be accessed to obtain response information associated with particular portrayals and subject responses may not be required.

Stimulus may involve actual physical products, services, interactions, and experiences. According to various embodiments, stimulus includes streaming video and audio provided over mechanisms such as broadcast television, cable television, satellite, etc. At 613, subject responses are collected using a variety of modalities, such as EEG, ERP, EOG, GSR, etc. In some examples, verbal and written responses can also be collected and correlated with neurological and neurophysiological responses. At 615, data is passed through a data cleanser to remove noise and artifacts that may make data more difficult to interpret. According to various embodiments, the data cleanser removes EEG electrical activity associated with blinking and other endogenous/exogenous artifacts.

According to various embodiments, data analysis is performed. Data analysis may include intra-modality response synthesis and cross-modality response synthesis to enhance effectiveness measures. It should be noted that in some particular instances, one type of synthesis may be performed without performing other types of synthesis. For example, cross-modality response synthesis may be performed with or without intra-modality synthesis.

A variety of mechanisms can be used to perform data analysis. In particular embodiments, a stimulus attributes repository is accessed to obtain attributes and characteristics of the stimulus materials, along with purposes, intents, objectives, etc. In particular embodiments, EEG response data is synthesized to provide an enhanced portrayal effectiveness assessment of effectiveness. According to various embodiments, EEG measures electrical activity resulting from thousands of simultaneous neural processes associated with different portions of the brain. EEG data can be classified in various bands. According to various embodiments, brainwave frequencies include delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma frequency ranges. Delta waves are classified as those less than 4 Hz and are prominent during deep sleep. Theta waves have frequencies between 3.5 to 7.5 Hz and are associated with memories, attention, emotions, and sensations. Theta waves are typically prominent during states of internal focus.

Alpha frequencies reside between 7.5 and 13 Hz and typically peak around 10 Hz. Alpha waves are prominent during states of relaxation. Beta waves have a frequency range between 14 and 30 Hz. Beta waves are prominent during states of motor control, long range synchronization between brain areas, analytical problem solving, judgment, and decision making. Gamma waves occur between 30 and 60 Hz and are involved in binding of different populations of neurons together into a network for the purpose of carrying out a certain cognitive or motor function, as well as in attention and memory. Because the skull and dermal layers attenuate waves in this frequency range, brain waves above 75-80 Hz are difficult to detect and are often not used for stimuli response portrayal effectiveness assessment.

However, the techniques and mechanisms of the present invention recognize that analyzing high gamma band (kappa-band: Above 60 Hz) measurements, in addition to theta, alpha, beta, and low gamma band measurements, enhances neurological attention, emotional engagement and retention component estimates. In particular embodiments, EEG measurements including difficult to detect high gamma or kappa band measurements are obtained, enhanced, and evaluated. Subject and task specific signature sub-bands in the theta, alpha, beta, gamma and kappa bands are identified to provide enhanced response estimates. According to various embodiments, high gamma waves (kappa-band) above 80 Hz (typically detectable with sub-cranial EEG and/or magnetoencephalograophy) can be used in inverse model-based enhancement of the frequency responses to the stimuli.

Various embodiments of the present invention recognize that particular sub-bands within each frequency range have particular prominence during certain activities. A subset of the frequencies in a particular band is referred to herein as a sub-band. For example, a sub-band may include the 40-45 Hz range within the gamma band. In particular embodiments, multiple sub-bands within the different bands are selected while remaining frequencies are band pass filtered. In particular embodiments, multiple sub-band responses may be enhanced, while the remaining frequency responses may be attenuated.

An information theory based band-weighting model is used for adaptive extraction of selective dataset specific, subject specific, task specific bands to enhance the effectiveness measure. Adaptive extraction may be performed using fuzzy scaling. Stimuli can be presented and enhanced measurements determined multiple times to determine the variation profiles across multiple presentations. Determining various profiles provides an enhanced portrayal effectiveness assessment of the primary responses as well as the longevity (wear-out) of the marketing and entertainment stimuli. The synchronous response of multiple individuals to stimuli presented in concert is measured to determine an enhanced across subject synchrony measure of effectiveness. According to various embodiments, the synchronous response may be determined for multiple subjects residing in separate locations or for multiple subjects residing in the same location.

Although a variety of synthesis mechanisms are described, it should be recognized that any number of mechanisms can be applied—in sequence or in parallel with or without interaction between the mechanisms.

Although intra-modality synthesis mechanisms provide enhanced significance data, additional cross-modality synthesis mechanisms can also be applied. A variety of mechanisms such as EEG, Eye Tracking, GSR, EOG, and facial emotion encoding are connected to a cross-modality synthesis mechanism. Other mechanisms as well as variations and enhancements on existing mechanisms may also be included. According to various embodiments, data from a specific modality can be enhanced using data from one or more other modalities. In particular embodiments, EEG typically makes frequency measurements in different bands like alpha, beta and gamma to provide estimates of significance. However, the techniques of the present invention recognize that significance measures can be enhanced further using information from other modalities.

For example, facial emotion encoding measures can be used to enhance the valence of the EEG emotional engagement measure. EOG and eye tracking saccadic measures of object entities can be used to enhance the EEG estimates of significance including but not limited to attention, emotional engagement, and memory retention. According to various embodiments, a cross-modality synthesis mechanism performs time and phase shifting of data to allow data from different modalities to align. In some examples, it is recognized that an EEG response will often occur hundreds of milliseconds before a facial emotion measurement changes. Correlations can be drawn and time and phase shifts made on an individual as well as a group basis. In other examples, saccadic eye movements may be determined as occurring before and after particular EEG responses. According to various embodiments, time corrected GSR measures are used to scale and enhance the EEG estimates of significance including attention, emotional engagement and memory retention measures.

Evidence of the occurrence or non-occurrence of specific time domain difference event-related potential components (like the DERP) in specific regions correlates with subject responsiveness to specific stimulus. According to various embodiments, ERP measures are enhanced using EEG time-frequency measures (ERPSP) in response to the presentation of the marketing and entertainment stimuli. Specific portions are extracted and isolated to identify ERP, DERP and ERPSP analyses to perform. In particular embodiments, an EEG frequency estimation of attention, emotion and memory retention (ERPSP) is used as a co-factor in enhancing the ERP, DERP and time-domain response analysis.

EOG measures saccades to determine the presence of attention to specific objects of stimulus. Eye tracking measures the subject's gaze path, location and dwell on specific objects of stimulus. According to various embodiments, EOG and eye tracking is enhanced by measuring the presence of lambda waves (a neurophysiological index of saccade effectiveness) in the ongoing EEG in the occipital and extra striate regions, triggered by the slope of saccade-onset to estimate the significance of the EOG and eye tracking measures. In particular embodiments, specific EEG signatures of activity such as slow potential shifts and measures of coherence in time-frequency responses at the Frontal Eye Field (FEF) regions that preceded saccade-onset are measured to enhance the effectiveness of the saccadic activity data.

GSR typically measures the change in general arousal in response to stimulus presented. According to various embodiments, GSR is enhanced by correlating EEG/ERP responses and the GSR measurement to get an enhanced estimate of subject engagement. The GSR latency baselines are used in constructing a time-corrected GSR response to the stimulus. The time-corrected GSR response is co-factored with the EEG measures to enhance GSR significance measures.

According to various embodiments, facial emotion encoding uses templates generated by measuring facial muscle positions and movements of individuals expressing various emotions prior to the testing session. These individual specific facial emotion encoding templates are matched with the individual responses to identify subject emotional response. In particular embodiments, these facial emotion encoding measurements are enhanced by evaluating inter-hemispherical asymmetries in EEG responses in specific frequency bands and measuring frequency band interactions. The techniques of the present invention recognize that not only are particular frequency bands significant in EEG responses, but particular frequency bands used for communication between particular areas of the brain are significant. Consequently, these EEG responses enhance the EMG, graphic and video based facial emotion identification.

According to various embodiments, post-stimulus versus pre-stimulus differential measurements of ERP time domain components in multiple regions of the brain (DERP) are measured at 617. The differential measures give a mechanism for eliciting responses attributable to the stimulus. For example the messaging response attributable to an ad or the brand response attributable to multiple brands is determined using pre-experience and post-experience estimates

At 619, target versus distracter stimulus differential responses are determined for different regions of the brain (DERP). At 621, event related time-frequency analysis of the differential response (DERPSPs) are used to assess the attention, emotion and memory retention measures across multiple frequency bands. According to various embodiments, the multiple frequency bands include theta, alpha, beta, gamma and high gamma or kappa. At 623, multiple trials are performed to enhance consumer experience portrayal effectiveness assessment measures.

At 625, processed data is provided to a data communication device for transmission over a network such as a wireless, wireline, satellite, or other type of communication network capable of transmitting data. Data is provided to response integration system at 627. According to various embodiments, the data communication device transmits data using protocols such as the File Transfer Protocol (FTP), Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) along with a variety of conventional, bus, wired network, wireless network, satellite, and proprietary communication protocols. The data transmitted can include the data in its entirety, excerpts of data, converted data, and/or elicited response measures. According to various embodiments, data is sent using a telecommunications, wireless, Internet, satellite, or any other communication mechanisms that is capable of conveying information from multiple subject locations for data integration and analysis. The mechanism may be integrated in a set top box, computer system, receiver, mobile device, etc.

In particular embodiments, the data communication device sends data to the response integration system 627. According to various embodiments, the response integration system 627 combines the analyzed responses to the experience/stimuli, with information on the available stimuli and its attributes. A variety of responses including user behavioral and survey responses are also collected an integrated.

According to various embodiments, the response integration system combines analyzed and enhanced responses to the stimulus material while using information about stimulus material attributes such as the location, movement, acceleration, and spatial relationships of various entities and objects. In particular embodiments, the response integration system also collects and integrates user behavioral and survey responses with the analyzed and enhanced response data to more effectively assess consumer experience patterns.

According to various embodiments, the consumer experience portrayal effectiveness assessment system provides data to a consumer experience repository 629 for the collection and storage of demographic, statistical and/or survey based responses to different entertainment, marketing, advertising and other audio/visual/tactile/olfactory material. If this information is stored externally, this system could include a mechanism for the push and/or pull integration of the data—including but not limited to querying, extracting, recording, modifying, and/or updating. This system integrates the requirements for the presented material, the assessed neuro-physiological and neuro-behavioral response measures, and the additional stimulus attributes such as demography/statistical/survey based responses into a synthesized measure for the total consumer experience.

According to various embodiments, the consumer experience repository stores information for temporal, spatial, activity, and event based components of stimulus material. For example, neuro-response data, statistical data, survey based response data, and demographic data may be aggregated and stored and associated with a particular component in a video stream. Examples of components may include a user talking about a product, viewing the product, purchasing product, opening a package, feeling the product, and using the product. In other examples, component may include watching a person hold a soda can, hearing the popping of the lid of the can, watching the fizz as the beverage is poured, and seeing someone drink the beverage. Each component may elicit a significantly different portrayal effectiveness assessment measurement.

FIG. 7 illustrates an example of a technique for estimating consumer experience. According to various embodiments, measurements from different modalities are obtained at 701. According to various embodiments, measurements including EEG, GSR, EOG, EKG, DERP, DERPSP, Pupilary Response, etc., are blended to obtain a combined measurement at 703. In particular embodiments, each measurement may have to be aligned appropriately in order to allow blending. According to various embodiments, a response integration system includes mechanisms to use and blend different measures from across the modalities from the data analyzer. In particular embodiments, the data includes the EEG, GSR, EOG, EKG, DERP, DERPSPs, pupilary response, GSR, eye movement, coherence, coupling and lambda wave based response. Measurements across modalities are blended to elicit a synthesized measure of consumer experience.

At 705, neuro-response measurements are combined with statistical, demographic, and/or survey based information. At 707, measurements are associated with different consumer experience portrayals. In some instances, some portrayals may be determined to be significantly more effective than other portrayals. At 709, components of a stimulus experience are identified. According to various embodiments, components may be identified manually and/or automatically. In some examples, components may be identified by recognizing lulls between neuro-response measurements. Lulls may indicate lack of a significant stimulus event. In other examples, components may be distinguished by scene breaks or significant changes in an image. In still other examples, components are identified by a stimulus material provider. A variety of mechanisms can be used to identify changes between events, actions, and elements of an experience. Attributes of a component are also identified and recorded. Attributes may include action levels, contrast, volume, rating, popularity, target audience, etc. At 713, the neuro-physiological and neuro-behavioral response other attributes and meta information on the stimulus (statistical, demographic and/or survey based) are correlated with components and attributes of the components of different portrayals. The correlated information may be stored for later analysis and retrieval.

The consumer experience portrayal effectiveness assessment system can further include an adaptive learning component that refines profiles and tracks variations responses to particular stimuli or series of stimuli over time.

According to various embodiments, various mechanisms such as the data collection mechanisms, the intra-modality synthesis mechanisms, cross-modality synthesis mechanisms, etc. are implemented on multiple devices. However, it is also possible that the various mechanisms be implemented in hardware, firmware, and/or software in a single system. FIG. 8 provides one example of a system that can be used to implement one or more mechanisms. For example, the system shown in FIG. 8 may be used to implement a consumer experience portrayal effectiveness assessment system.

According to particular example embodiments, a system 800 suitable for implementing particular embodiments of the present invention includes a processor 801, a memory 803, an interface 811, and a bus 815 (e.g., a PCI bus). When acting under the control of appropriate software or firmware, the processor 801 is responsible for such tasks such as pattern generation. Various specially configured devices can also be used in place of a processor 801 or in addition to processor 801. The complete implementation can also be done in custom hardware. The interface 811 is typically configured to send and receive data packets or data segments over a network. Particular examples of interfaces the device supports include host bus adapter (HBA) interfaces, Ethernet interfaces, frame relay interfaces, cable interfaces, DSL interfaces, token ring interfaces, and the like.

In addition, various high-speed interfaces may be provided such as fast Ethernet interfaces, Gigabit Ethernet interfaces, ATM interfaces, HSSI interfaces, POS interfaces, FDDI interfaces and the like. Generally, these interfaces may include ports appropriate for communication with the appropriate media. In some cases, they may also include an independent processor and, in some instances, volatile RAM. The independent processors may control such communications intensive tasks as data synthesis.

According to particular example embodiments, the system 800 uses memory 803 to store data, algorithms and program instructions. The program instructions may control the operation of an operating system and/or one or more applications, for example. The memory or memories may also be configured to store received data and process received data.

Because such information and program instructions may be employed to implement the systems/methods described herein, the present invention relates to tangible, machine readable media that include program instructions, state information, etc. for performing various operations described herein. Examples of machine-readable media include, but are not limited to, magnetic media such as hard disks, floppy disks, and magnetic tape; optical media such as CD-ROM disks and DVDs; magneto-optical media such as optical disks; and hardware devices that are specially configured to store and perform program instructions, such as read-only memory devices (ROM) and random access memory (RAM). Examples of program instructions include both machine code, such as produced by a compiler, and files containing higher level code that may be executed by the computer using an interpreter.

Although the foregoing invention has been described in some detail for purposes of clarity of understanding, it will be apparent that certain changes and modifications may be practiced within the scope of the appended claims. Therefore, the present embodiments are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive and the invention is not to be limited to the details given herein, but may be modified within the scope and equivalents of the appended claims. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A method, comprising: obtaining first neuro-response data from a first frequency band of brain activity measured in a first hemisphere of a brain of a first subject exposed to a second subject having a consumer experience and second neuro-response data from a second frequency band of brain activity measured in a second hemisphere of the brain, the first frequency band and the second frequency band occurring at a same period in time, and the consumer experience having a plurality of components; identifying, using a processor, a first asymmetry based on the first neuro-response data and the second neuro-response data for a first of the plurality of components, the first asymmetry identified by: comparing a first amplitude of the first frequency band and a second amplitude of the second frequency band to determine a first difference between the first amplitude of the first frequency band and the second amplitude of the second frequency band; and assigning a first value to the first asymmetry based on the first difference between the first amplitude of the first frequency band and the second amplitude of the second frequency band; identifying, a second asymmetry based on the first neuro-response data and the second neuro-response data for a second of the plurality of components, the second asymmetry identified by: comparing a third amplitude of the first frequency band and a fourth of the second frequency band amplitude to determine a second difference between the third amplitude of the first frequency band and the fourth amplitude of the second frequency band; and assigning a second value to the second asymmetry based on the second difference between the third amplitude of the first frequency band and the fourth amplitude of the second frequency band; and assessing a first effectiveness of the first component based on the first value of the first asymmetry and a second effectiveness of the second component based on the second value of the second asymmetry.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the plurality of components includes a plurality of actions made by the second subject.
 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the plurality of actions includes at least one of purchasing, opening, consuming or recounting an advertisement, entertainment or product.
 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the plurality of components includes a plurality of sensations experienced by the second subject.
 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the plurality of sensations includes at least one of seeing, hearing, tasting, smelling or feeling a product.
 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the first and second neuro-response data are collected by electroencephalography, and further comprising collecting third neuro-response data using a second data collection modality different than the electroencephalography and assessing at least one of the first effectiveness or the second effectiveness based on the third neuro-response data.
 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the second data collection modality includes at least one of electrooculography, galvanic skin response, electrocardiography, pupillary dilation or eye tracking.
 8. The method of claim 1, wherein at least one of the first frequency band or the second frequency band includes at least one of a theta frequency band, an alpha frequency band, a beta frequency band, a gamma frequency band or a high gamma frequency band.
 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the first frequency band and the second frequency band are different types of frequency bands.
 10. The method of claim 1 further comprising aligning one or more of the first neuro-response or the second neuro-response with one or more actions made by the second subject.
 11. A system, comprising: a data collector to obtain first neuro-response data from a first frequency band of brain activity measured in a first hemisphere of a brain of a first subject exposed to a second subject having a consumer experience and second neuro-response data from a second frequency band of brain activity measured in a second hemisphere of the brain, the first frequency band and the second frequency occurring at a same period in time, and the consumer experience having a plurality of components; and an analyzer comprising a processor configured to: identify a first asymmetry based on the first neuro-response data and the second neuro-response data for a first of the plurality of components, the first asymmetry identified by: comparing a first amplitude of the first frequency band and a second amplitude of the second frequency band to determine a first difference between the first amplitude of the first frequency band and the second amplitude of the second frequency band; and assigning a first value to the first asymmetry based on the first difference between the first amplitude of the first frequency band and the second amplitude of the second frequency band; identify a second asymmetry based on the first neuro-response data and the second neuro-response data for a second of the plurality of components, the second asymmetry identified by: comparing a third amplitude of the first frequency band and a fourth amplitude of the second frequency band to determine a second difference between the third amplitude of the first frequency band and the fourth amplitude of the second frequency band; assigning a second value to the second asymmetry based on the second difference between the third amplitude of the first frequency band and the fourth amplitude of the second frequency band; and assess a first effectiveness of the first component based on the first value of the first asymmetry and a second effectiveness of the second component based on the second value of the second asymmetry.
 12. The system of claim 11, wherein the plurality of components includes a plurality of actions made by the second subject.
 13. The system of claim 12, wherein the plurality of actions includes at least one of purchasing, opening, consuming or recounting an advertisement, entertainment or product.
 14. The system of claim 11, wherein the plurality of components includes a plurality of sensations experienced by the second subject.
 15. The system of claim 14, wherein the plurality of sensations includes at least one of seeing, hearing, tasting, smelling or feeling a product.
 16. The system of claim 11, wherein the data collector is to obtain third neuro-response data using a second data collection modality different than electroencephalography, and the data analyzer is to assess at least one of the first effectiveness or the second effectiveness based on the third neuro-response data.
 17. The system of claim 16, wherein the second data collection modality includes at least one of electrooculography, galvanic skin response, electrocardiography, pupillary dilation or eye tracking.
 18. A tangible machine readable storage device or disc comprising storing machine readable instructions thereon which, when read, cause a machine to at least: identify a first asymmetry based on first neuro-response data and the second neuro-response data for a first of the plurality of components, the first neuro-response data obtained from a first frequency band of brain activity measured in a first hemisphere of a brain of a first subject exposed to a second subject having a consumer experience, the second neuro-response data obtained from a second frequency band of brain activity measured in a second hemisphere of the brain, the first frequency band and the second frequency band occurring at a same period in time, the consumer experience having a plurality of components, and the first asymmetry identified by: comparing a first amplitude of the first frequency band and a second amplitude of the second frequency band to determine a first difference between the first amplitude of the first frequency band and the second amplitude of the second frequency band; and assigning a first value to the first asymmetry based on the first difference between the first amplitude of the first frequency band and the second amplitude of the second frequency band; identify a second asymmetry based on the first neuro-response data and the second neuro-response data for a second of the plurality of components, the second asymmetry identified by: comparing a third amplitude of the first frequency band and a fourth amplitude of the second frequency band to determine a second difference between the third amplitude of the first frequency band and the fourth amplitude of the second frequency band; and assigning a second value to the second asymmetry based on the second difference between the third amplitude of the first frequency band and the fourth amplitude of the second frequency band; assess a first effectiveness of the first component based on the first value of the first symmetry; and assess a second effectiveness of the second component based on the second value of the second symmetry.
 19. The machine readable device or disc of claim 18, wherein the plurality of components includes a plurality of actions made by the second subject.
 20. The machine readable device or disc of claim 18, wherein the plurality of actions includes at least one of purchasing, opening, consuming or recounting an advertisement, entertainment or product.
 21. The machine readable device or disc of claim 18, wherein the plurality of components includes a plurality of sensations experienced by the second subject.
 22. The machine readable device or disc of claim 18, wherein the plurality of sensations includes at least one of seeing, hearing, tasting, smelling or feeling an advertisement, entertainment or product. 